Monday, November 20, 2006

Reinstating the draft?

I'm the grandchild of two veterans.

After 9/11, I would have enlisted but then the President started calling for a war with Iraq and those feelings of wanting to enlist decreased.

Anyway, it looks as if Congressman Charlie Rangel is at it again with plans to propose a bill to re-instate the draft.
Americans would have to sign up for a new military draft after turning 18 under a bill the incoming chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee says he will introduce next year.

Rep. Charles Rangel, D-N.Y., said Sunday he sees his idea as a way to deter politicians from launching wars.

"There's no question in my mind that this president and this administration would never have invaded Iraq, especially on the flimsy evidence that was presented to the Congress, if indeed we had a draft and members of Congress and the administration thought that their kids from their communities would be placed in harm's way," Rangel said.

Rangel, a veteran of the Korean War who has unsuccessfully sponsored legislation on conscription in the past, has said the all-volunteer military disproportionately puts the burden of war on minorities and lower-income families.

Rangel said he will propose a measure early next year. While he said he is serious about the proposal, there is little evident support among the public or lawmakers for it.

In 2003, Rangel proposed a measure covering people age 18 to 26. It was defeated 402-2 the following year. This year, he offered a plan to mandate military service for men and women between age 18 and 42; it went nowhere in the Republican-led Congress.
I am thankful for the troops serving our country out of their own free will.

For Congress to reinstate the draft, it would be political suicide.

No comments:

Post a Comment